Hello Xanashi ~
I hope this message finds you doing well. Once again... a HUGE THANK YOU !!!! ... for the new BETA release !! I hope you know how much I appreciate all your hard work & dedication - past, present and future - you have given to creating one of the most important tools I have had installed on my desktop for years now!! I'm sure there are thousands of others out there that feel the same way. I'll be making a donation on my next payday, and I'd encourage anyone else who is reading this & uses Icaros - it's well deserved !! By the way, Icaros has been running *very very* smooth - seriously, not a single issue, since I installed the last version. Just awesome !!
With that said... now... on to a possible bug I'd like to report (sorry, I wasn't purposely looking for a bug - it just happened !!). I'm currently running the v3.3.1 Beta 1 - and I noticed a significant difference in the <file count/cache file size> from this version to the last (v3.3.0 Final). I've attached screenshots, so it should be pretty self explanatory. Any questions, or debugging help I can provide, of course, let me know. Also, this is nothing that is causing an issue for me, at least not yet. I haven't noticed anything abnormal in the program - no errors, no crashes, etc. I just happened to check the new cache directory and noted the significant increase in cache size.
Question: The reason I decided to "start from scratch" by setting a new cache directory in Icaros is because of an all new network drive mapping structure that I've implemented on my network. Old drive mappings to folders with thousands of movies & youtube download/upload videos are gone. How does Icaros & it's cache handle events like this - when a thumbnail for a certain video is not longer located at Y:\aaaaa\bbbbb\ccccc.. but it's now at Z:\ddddd\eeee\ff\ ??? Does it just create a new entry for the new location of that video and the old one still lingers in the cache even though it's now dead ? In fear that the cache has gotten "dirty" - I decided to just let it start from scratch. Is starting from scratch when there's significant remaps a good idea ? And know, I'm not suggesting/asking for some kind of dead link cleanup enhancement - that could be a small nightmare I would think - I'm going with just "reseting" Icaros every once in a while.
Again, many thanks for Icaros !
-Matt
❗❗❗❗ 👇👇👇👇👇 👇👇👇 MORE INFO 👇👇👇👇👇 👇👇👇👇 ❗❗❗❗
I hope this message finds you doing well. Once again... a HUGE THANK YOU !!!! ... for the new BETA release !! I hope you know how much I appreciate all your hard work & dedication - past, present and future - you have given to creating one of the most important tools I have had installed on my desktop for years now!! I'm sure there are thousands of others out there that feel the same way. I'll be making a donation on my next payday, and I'd encourage anyone else who is reading this & uses Icaros - it's well deserved !! By the way, Icaros has been running *very very* smooth - seriously, not a single issue, since I installed the last version. Just awesome !!
With that said... now... on to a possible bug I'd like to report (sorry, I wasn't purposely looking for a bug - it just happened !!). I'm currently running the v3.3.1 Beta 1 - and I noticed a significant difference in the <file count/cache file size> from this version to the last (v3.3.0 Final). I've attached screenshots, so it should be pretty self explanatory. Any questions, or debugging help I can provide, of course, let me know. Also, this is nothing that is causing an issue for me, at least not yet. I haven't noticed anything abnormal in the program - no errors, no crashes, etc. I just happened to check the new cache directory and noted the significant increase in cache size.
Question: The reason I decided to "start from scratch" by setting a new cache directory in Icaros is because of an all new network drive mapping structure that I've implemented on my network. Old drive mappings to folders with thousands of movies & youtube download/upload videos are gone. How does Icaros & it's cache handle events like this - when a thumbnail for a certain video is not longer located at Y:\aaaaa\bbbbb\ccccc.. but it's now at Z:\ddddd\eeee\ff\ ??? Does it just create a new entry for the new location of that video and the old one still lingers in the cache even though it's now dead ? In fear that the cache has gotten "dirty" - I decided to just let it start from scratch. Is starting from scratch when there's significant remaps a good idea ? And know, I'm not suggesting/asking for some kind of dead link cleanup enhancement - that could be a small nightmare I would think - I'm going with just "reseting" Icaros every once in a while.
Again, many thanks for Icaros !
-Matt
❗❗❗❗ 👇👇👇👇👇 👇👇👇 MORE INFO 👇👇👇👇👇 👇👇👇👇 ❗❗❗❗